|
Hey Reader, I have a confession. For the last few weeks, I barely worked on my business. Here's what happened.When the Middle East situation escalated, I left Dubai. Since then, I've been all over the place. Different countries, different time zones, zero routine. I kept delivering to my AI Architect Program clients, but everything else was in maintenance mode. And almost the entire rest of my day? I spent it on Twitter. Watching the AI wars. Reading every hot take. Getting genuinely angry about the attacks on Sam Altman. Refreshing the feed like it was my full-time job. New model drops. New tool launches. New drama every single day. And I built absolutely nothing. Here's why this matters.You know that feeling when a new AI tool drops and suddenly you're researching it for 2 hours instead of building your app? That was me for the past few weeks. And I'm supposed to be the guy who knows better. But here's what I realized once I finally closed the tab. Over the past 12 months, I've tested over 100 AI coding tools. Chinese models like GLM-5.1, MiniMax-2.7, Kimi K2.5. New coders, new agents, new everything. And after all that testing, you know what I actually use every day? Three tools. Two models. Cursor. Codex. Claude Code. Running Claude and GPT models. That's it. Builders who ship aren't smarter.They just ignore more. Think of it like a buffet. You walk in and there are 47 dishes. You could spend 30 minutes deciding, tasting a little bit of everything, and leave bloated and confused. Or you could grab the three things you already know are good, sit down, and eat. The people building real solutions for their business right now are not the ones reading every announcement. They're the ones who picked their tools months ago and never looked back. Most of my students use one or two tools, and they thrive. You already know what works. You don't need another comparison video. You don't need me to tell you Cursor is great. ... or that Claude/Codex models are great value subscriptions. You already know this. The question is: are you building, or are you scrolling? The less I scrolled, the more I built.The moment I closed Twitter and opened Cursor, everything changed. I shipped more the past 4 days than I did in the 4 weeks before. All in the name of "staying up to date" and "monitoring the situation." That's not a productivity hack. That's just wasting opportunity. Every hour you spend researching a new tool is an hour you didn't spend building your actual app. And your app doesn't care which model is 2% better on some benchmark. It cares that you showed up and did the work. Do this now.So here's my challenge to you this week. Pick your tool/s. Close your tabs. And build something real. Not the perfect thing. Just the next thing. Talk soon, P.S. Have you tried AI Skills already? If not, you absolutely should. I've created a FREE Skills Vault that combines all the best skills that are worth using, with notes on why and when to use and how to install them. Enjoy! |
Coder of 20+ years teaching non-technical people how to build their own software business in 30 days with AI. No devs or code required.
Hey Reader, People keep telling me their AI "breaks everything" and "makes weird decisions." I use the same models. Same tools. Same subscriptions. But I almost never have these problems. For the longest time, I thought I was just lucky. Then I looked at what I actually do differently. It comes down to three things. 1. A minimal AGENT․md file. Think of this like a one-page employee handbook for your AI. Mine is short. Genuinely minimal. It tells the AI to: Keep docs updated as it makes...
Hey Reader, Anthropic just announced free monthly API credits for all Claude subscribers! 🎉 Sounds great, right? Well, let's read the fine print... The catch nobody's talking about. Starting June 15th, third-party tools like Conductor can no longer tap into your Claude subscription directly. Instead, they will now pull from those shiny new API credits. But here's the thing. If you're on the $100/month Max plan, you get $100 in API credits. Claude Opus 4.7 will chew through that in a few...
Hey Reader, This is not our regular scheduled programming. If you're old enough to remember the ILOVEYOU virus from 2000s, this will feel familiar. Back then, one email worm hit 10% of every computer connected to the internet. It caused $10 billion in damage. All because people clicked one email attachment. That was 26 years ago, and this week it's kinda happening again. The new virus doesn't need you to click. A group just compromised hundreds of packages across coding ecosystem. Think of...